Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Resilience (JEBR) is dedicated to fostering research, analysis and study concerning the Entrepreneurship and Business Resilience. The Journal accepts papers written by Proffesors, young researchers and PhD students in order to better involve them in academic publishing.
JEBR was founded in 2018 by professor Mirjana Radović-Marković, PhD. Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management in Novi Sad has published the Journal since 2018. It is the first journal focusing on gender related aspects of entrepreneurship in Serbia. Entrepreneurship and economic resilience are two seemingly different issues which are inherently connected. Economic resilience is an emerging field which has been applied to study economic performance and responsiveness to external shocks in different regions. Shocks such as financial crisis which have been faced by entrepreneurial actions in the economic history of the regions; however, the entrepreneurship-economic resilience nexus is recently drawing the attention of scholars and policy makers. This approach, more specifically, could pave the way for those societies which are following economic resilience policies to handle their economic issues.
Since 2021., the journal has listed within the reference list of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Serbia (code M54).
Objective and Mission: The main objective of the journal is to fill the existing knowledge gap within the fields of entrepreneurship and economic resilience. In spite of the raising interest in this field, there are very few sources of research for this subject, especially in the field of entrepreneurship-economic resilience nexus.
Dealing with unethical behaviour
Anyone may inform the Editor-in-Chief / Editorial Board at any time of suspected unethical behaviour or any type of misconduct by giving the necessary credible information/evidence to start an investigation.
- Editor-in-Chief makes the decision regarding the initiation of an investigation.
- During an investigation, any evidence should be treated as confidential and only made available to those strictly involved in the process.
- The accused will always be given the chance to respond to any charges made against them.
- If it is judged at the end of the investigation that misconduct has occurred, then it will be classified as either minor or serious.
Minor misconduct (with no influence on the integrity of the paper and the journal, for example, when it comes to misunderstanding or wrong application of publishing standards) will be dealt directly with authors and reviewers without involving any other parties. Outcomes include:
- Sending a warning letter to authors and/or reviewers.
- Publishing correction of a paper, e.g. when sources properly quoted in the text are omitted from the reference list.
- Publishing an erratum, e.g. if the error was made by editorial staff.
In the case of major misconduct the Editor-in-Chief / Editorial Board may adopt different measures:
- Publication of a formal announcement or editorial describing the misconduct.
- Informing officially the author’s/reviewer’s affiliating institution.
- The formal, announced retraction of publications from the journal in accordance with the Retraction Policy.
- A ban on submissions from an individual for a defined period.
- Referring a case to a professional organization or legal authority for further investigation and action.
The above actions may be taken separately or jointly. If necessary, in the process of resolving the case relevant expert organizations, bodies, or individuals may be consulted.
When dealing with unethical behaviour, the Editorial Board will rely on the guidelines and recommendations provided by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
International Review does not publish plagiarised papers. The Editorial Board has adopted the stance that plagiarism, where someone assumes another’s ideas, words, or other creative expression as one’s own, is a clear violation of scientific ethics. Plagiarism may also involve a violation of copyright law, punishable by legal action.
Plagiarism includes the following:
- Verbatim (word for word), or almost verbatim copying, or purposely paraphrasing portions of another author’s work without clearly indicating the source or marking the copied fragment (for example, using quotation marks) in a way described under Authors’ responsibilities;
- Copying equations, figures or tables from someone else’s paper without properly citing the source and/or without permission from the original author or the copyright holder.
Any manuscript which shows obvious signs of plagiarism will be automatically rejected. In case plagiarism is discovered in a paper that has already been published by the journal, it will be retracted in accordance with the procedure described under Retraction policy.
To prevent plagiarism the manuscripts are submitted to a plagiarism detection process using iThenticate/CrossRef within SCIndeks Assistant. The results obtained are verified by the Editorial Board in accordance with the guidelines and recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
FOCUS AND SCOPE
Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Resilience (JEBR) is dedicated to fostering research, analysis and study concerning the Entrepreneurship and Business Resilience. The Journal accepts papers written by Proffesors, young researchers and PhD students in order to better involve them in academic publishing. Submitted papers should be focused on the following research areas and disciplines:
- Conceptualizing economic resilience
- Regional/national economic resilience policies
- Economic resilience and entrepreneurship
- Economic resilience in emerging markets
- Innovation and economic resilience
- Economic resilience and employment (job)
- Economic resilience and investment activity
- Economic resilience and competitiveness
- Economic resilience and social impact
- Socio-economic resilience
- Entrepreneurship policy making and economic resilience
- Hidden economic resilience
- Urban/rural economic resilience
- SMEs and economic resilience
- Economic resilience and market failure
- Heterogeneous economic resilience
- Sustainability and economic resilience
- Media and economic resilience
- Environmental and economic resilience
- Economic resilience and self-reliance
- Stories of economic resilience
- Economic resilience and climate change
- Economic resilience education
- Theoretical basis of resilience and its applications in entrepreneurship
- Entrepreneurs’ resilience and its relationship with entrepreneurial type
- Small Business Disaster Planning
- Business continuity
- Business Continuity Planning Methodology
- Risk management
- Information security
- Facilities management
- Emergency management
- Organisational resilience
- Crisis management
- Crisis communications
- Resilient Leadership
- The effects of leaders' behaviors on employees' resilience
- Financial Elements of Business Resilience
- Individual Resilience and Entrepreneurial Success
- Resilience in the Workplace/stress management
- Resilience Training in the Workplace
- Resilience in entrepreneurial team
- Resilience and Globalization
- The role of diversity in organizational resilience
Authors who submit their manuscripts to be considered for publication in JEBR must not claim nor submit the academic work of another as one’s own.
Plagiarism is defined as copying another’s text or ideas and passing the copied material as your work. In other words, plagiarism is fraudulently claiming another’s work as one own for self-benefit. The Journal has a zero-tolerance policy against plagiarism and any potential plagiarism within the works submitted will disqualify them from publication.
For all work published within the Journal, any and all text taken from other work in the literature must be cited within the work itself as its own and references provided.
This definition of plagiarism applies for copied text and ideas:
- regardless of the source of the copied text or idea;
- regardless of whether the author(s) of the text or idea which you have copied actually copied that text or idea from another source;
- regardless of whether or not the authorship of the text or idea which you copy is known;
- regardless of the nature of your text (journal paper/article, webpage, book chapter, paper submitted for a college course, etc.) into which you copy the text or idea;
- regardless of whether or not the author of the source of the copied material permits for the material to be copied; and
- regardless of whether you are or are not the author of the source of the copied text or idea (self-plagiarism).
Quoted from “Plagiarism: What It Is and How to Avoid It”, Peter Cobbett, PhD, August 2016
Submitted manuscripts that fall under the definition of plagiarism will not be considered for publishing. JEBR is using similarity ("plagiarism") detection software iThenticate.
OPEN ACCESS POLICY
JEBR is an Open Access Journal. All articles can be downloaded free of charge and used in accordance with the license that is provided below each published article.
This journal provides immediate Open Access to its contents on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global interexchange of knowledge.
JEBR encourages readers, authors and librarians to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search or link to the full texts of its articles as well as allows its wider readership to use them for any other lawful purpose.
The journal does not charge any fees at submission, reviewing, and production.
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
Submitting authors should contact their contributors to check as to whether they may have additional privacy requirements upon submitting.
It is mandatory for the author(s) to identify whether any of their own research has been sponsored or has received financial support of any kind for their submitted papers to the Journal. Sponsored content must be clearly identified to readers as sponsored. Supporting and sponsoring agencies must be clearly stated in a separate sponsorship declaration listed at the end of the paper, prior to bibliography.
A manuscript should contain sufficient details and references to enable reviewers and, subsequently, readers to verify the claims presented therein. Intentional presentation of false claims represents a violation of ethical standards. Authors are exclusively responsible for the contents of their submitted manuscripts. Where necessary, authors must have obtained permission from all the persons or institutions directly involved in the research of submitted manuscripts for publication. Authors wishing to include illustrations, tables or other materials in their articles that have been already published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the primary copyright holders. Any material received without such evidence provided will be assumed to originate from the authors themselves.
Authors are required to list only the persons who have significantly contributed to the content of the manuscript as authors, i.e. they shall list all individuals who have significantly contributed to the content of the manuscript as authors. If persons other than the authors were involved in significant aspects of the research project and drafting the manuscript, their contribution should be mentioned in a footnote or the acknowledgement section.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SOURCES
Authors are required to properly cite sources that have significantly influenced the content of their research and their manuscript. Information received in a private conversation or correspondence with third parties while reviewing project applications, manuscripts and similar materials must not be used without explicit written consent of the source.
Authors should disclose in their manuscripts any financial or any other conflicts of interest that might have influenced the results presented or their interpretations thereof.
What Represents a Competing Interest?
A competing interest is anything that interferes with or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making and/or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to JEBR.
Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional or personal. Competing interests can arise in relation to an organisation or another person.
Declaring all potential competing interests is a requirement at JEBR and is integral to the transparent reporting of research.
Failure to declare competing interests can result in immediate rejection of a manuscript. If an undisclosed competing interest comes to light after publication, JEBR will take action following COPE guidelines and issue a public notification to the community.
Financial competing interests
Financial competing interests include but are not limited to:
- Ownership of stocks or shares
- Paid employment or consultancy
- Board membership
- Patent applications (pending or actual) including individual applications or those belonging to the institution to which the authors are affiliated and from which the authors may benefit
- Research grants (from any source, restricted or unrestricted)
- Travel grants and honoraria for speaking or participation at meetings
- Non-financial competing interests
Non-financial competing interests include but are not limited to:
- Acting as an expert witness
- Membership in a government or other advisory board
- Relationship (paid or unpaid) with organisations and funding bodies including nongovernmental organisations, research institutions, or charities
- Membership of lobbying or advocacy organisations
- Writing or consulting for an educational company
- Personal relationships (i.e. friend, spouse, family member, current or previous mentor, adversary) with individuals involved in the submission or evaluation of a paper, such as authors, reviewers, editors, or members of the editorial board of a JEBR journal
- Personal convictions (political, religious, ideological, or other) related to a paper's topic that might interfere with an unbiased publication process (at the stage of authorship, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication
Note: competing interests statement quoted from PLOS.
ERRORS IN PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Should an author find an error in their published article, the author(s) are required to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher to retract or correct the article.
Reviewers shall deliver a well-argumented and unbiased evaluation of the scientific value of the manuscript to the editor by a given deadline. The reviewers shall assess the manuscript to confirm as to whether it complies with the profile of the journal, the validity of the topic investigated and the applied methods, the originality of the information and data presented in the manuscript, as well as that it is appropriately presented in a readable academic style. Reviewers must notify the editor of any violations of ethical standards by the authors or any knowledge thereof. Reviewers are to note any published works that have not been cited by the authors that may prove relevant to the work. Reviewers are to notify the editor to the substantial similarities between a reviewed manuscript and any other considered, published or reviewed for publication by any other journal. Reviewers must also alert the editor if the same manuscript is submitted to several journals at the same time.
Reviewers must not be in a conflict of interest with either the authors or the sources of funding for the manuscript under review. If the reviewer is in such conflict, it must be reported to the editor immediately in order for another reviewer to be assigned.
Any reviewers who deems themselves to be incapable of carrying out their reviewing duties are to notify the editor in order for another reviewer to be assigned.
Reviews must be conducted objectively. Any personal criticism of the author is deemed inappropriate. The reviewers must express their views clearly accompanied by supporting arguments.
Manuscripts received for review are confidential documents. The reviewers must not use any unpublished material from the submitted manuscripts without the explicit written consent of their authors and the information and ideas presented in the submitted therein must be kept confidential and must not be used for personal gain.
The submitted manuscripts are subject to a review process. The purpose of the review is to assist the editor in deciding whether a manuscript is accepted or not as well as to improve the quality of the manuscripts through correspondence with their authors.
All reviews are to remain anonymous.
The reviewer must finish their review within ten days from the date the manuscript has been received. If unable to do so within the given time, the reviewer must notify the editor-in-chief immediately.
All reviews are to be done free of charge.
The choice of reviewers is at the editor’s discretion. The reviewers must have a respective academic background for the subject of the manuscript being reviewed. Reviewers are not allowed to originate from the same institution as the author of the manuscript under review nor may the reviewers have had any recent joint publications with any of the authors of the manuscript. During the review process, the editor may request the author provide supplementary material (including raw data) as to make a judgment on the scientific contribution and merit of the manuscript. The editor and reviewer shall also keep such information as confidential and shall not use it for personal gain.
The editorial board shall be the party responsible for the review and all aspects thereof. Should the authors have any objections to a review, the editorial board shall check whether the review is objective and whether it meets the academic standards required. Should there be any question concerning the objectivity or quality of the review, the editor is required to the seek opinions of other reviewers.
This journal uses double-blind review.
The average number of weeks between submission and publication is 7 weeks.
PROCEDURES FOR DEALING WITH UNETHICAL BEHAVIOUR
Any individual or institution may at any time inform the editor and/or editorial staff of any suspected unethical behaviour or any manuscript by providing the necessary evidence thereof.
In agreement with the editorial board, it shall be the decision of the editor-in-chief shall as to whether initiate an investigation procedure. Upon its undertaking, any evidence will be considered confidential and will only be presented to those persons directly involved in the procedure. The persons suspected to have violated any ethical standards will be given the opportunity to respond to any charges made against them. If it is established that any misconduct has occurred, they will be assessed as being either minor or major ethical violations.
Situations characterised as a minor violation will be dealt directly with the person(s) having committed the violation but shall exclude third parties. (For instance: by notifying the author/reviewer that a minor violation has occurred as a result of misunderstanding or misapplication of academic standards, a letter of warming to the author /reviewer who has committed the minor violation.)
Major violation of ethical standards
The editor-in-chief is to decide upon any major violations of ethical standards in concert with the editorial board. Should it prove necessary, an outside group of consultants may be included. The measures to be undertaken are the following which may be implemented separately or jointly:
- the published announcement or editorial describing the violation of ethical standards;
- a retraction of the published article following the procedure described under the Retraction Policy;
- a ban on submissions from the authors for a period to be defined;
- referring the case to a professional organisation or other authorities for further administrative or judicial action.
When dealing with unethical behaviour, the editorial board of the journal is to rely on the guidelines and recommendations provided by the Committee on Publication Ethics – COPE.
Any violation of the rights of publishers, copyright holders or authors, of professional ethical codes, fraudulent claims of authorship, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data as well as all other cases of significant violation of ethical standards require the retraction of the published article.
When withdrawal or retraction is carried out to correct mistakes to already published articles that have been detected thereof, it is done so to preserve scientific integrity, not to punish the author.
Libraries and scientific bodies have developed standards to handle retractions, whose practices have also been adopted by The Journal of Entrepreneurship and Education The retracted article is to be kept in its original form, with a watermark on the PDF indicating on each page that the article has been retracted (RETRACTED).
The journals allow authors to deposit the final paper in PDF format in an institutional repository and/or non-commercial subject-based repositories, or to publish them on their personal websites (including social networking sites, such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, etc.) and/or on the website of the institution in which they are employed, one year following the publication in the journal. Thereby they must state the primary bibliographic data on the article published in the journal (authors, article title, journal title, year, volume, pagination).
Once the manuscript is accepted for publication, authors shall transfer the copyright to the publisher. If the submitted manuscript is not accepted for printing by the journal, the authors shall retain all their rights. The following rights on the manuscript are transferred to the publisher, including any supplementary materials and any parts, extracts or elements of the manuscript:
- the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript in printed form, including print-on-demand;
- the right to print prepublications, reprints and special editions of the manuscript;
- the right to translate the manuscript into other languages;
- the right to reproduce the manuscript using photomechanical or similar means including, but not limited to photocopy, and the right to distribute these copies;
- the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript electronically or optically using and all data carriers or storage media, and especially in machine-readable/digitalized form on data carriers such as hard drive, CD-ROM, DVD, Blu-ray Disc (BD), MiniDisc, data tapes, and the right to reproduce and distribute the article via these data carriers;
- the right to store the manuscript in databases, including online databases, as well as the right to transmit the manuscript in all technical systems and modes;
- the right to make the manuscript available to the public or closed user groups on individual demand, for use on monitors or other readers (including e-books), and in printable form for the user, either via the Internet, online service or via internal or external networks.
Articles are published under the Attribution-Non-Commercial-Non-Derivate 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) license.
The views expressed in the published works do not express the views of the editor and members of the editorial board. Authors assume their legal and moral responsibility for the ideas expressed in their articles. The publisher will not be held responsible should there be any claims for compensation.
PUBLICATION ETHICS AND PUBLICATION MALPRACTICE STATEMENT
The ethical policy of JEBR is based on the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines and complies with IR codes of conduct.
1. Duties and Responsibilities of Authors
- Submitted manuscript must be the original work of the author(s);The only unpublished manuscript should be submitted;
- It is unethical to submit a manuscript to more than one journal concurrently;
- Any conflict of interest must be clearly stated;
- Acknowledge the sources of data used in the development of the manuscript;
- The submitting (corresponding) author is responsible for ensuring that all the other co-authors have approved the manuscript article's publication;
- All authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
2. Submission Declaration
Submission of an article implies that:
The work described is authentic and valid and that neither this manuscript nor one with considerably similar content under this authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere including electronically in the same form, in English or another language, without the written consent the copyright holder.
3. Duties and Responsibilities of Reviewers
- The Reviewers of the journal should assist the Editors in deciding for publishing the submitted manuscripts;
- The Reviewers should maintain the confidentiality of manuscripts, which they are invited to review;
- The Reviewers should provide comments in time that will help editors to make a decision on the submitted manuscript to be published or not;
- The Reviewers comments against each invited manuscript should be technical, professional and objective;
- The Reviewers should disclose and try to avoid any conflict of interest.
4. Duties and Responsibilities of Editors
Editors of JEBR must confirm the following:
- That all manuscript is evaluated in fairness based on the intellectual content of the paper regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, religion, citizenry nor political values of authors;
- The Editorial Board takes responsibility for making publication decisions for submitted manuscript based on the reviewer’s evaluation of the manuscript, policies of the journal editorial board and legal restraint acting against plagiarism, libel and copyright infringement;
- Preserve the anonymity of reviewers.
5. Publishing ethics issues
- Monitoring/safeguarding publishing ethics by editorial board;
- Guidelines for retracting articles;
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record;
- Preclude business needs from compromising intellectual and ethical standards;
- Always be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed.
5.1. Plagiarism detection
Plagiarism occurs when someone presents the work of others (data, text, or theories) as if it was his/her own without proper acknowledgement. To help discover potential misconduct in the form of plagiarism or duplicate/redundant at the submission stage, JEBR is using similarity ("plagiarism") detection software.
5.2. Duplicate submission/publication and redundant publication
Translations of articles without proper permission or notification and resubmission of previously published Open Access articles are considered duplications.
5.3. Citation Manipulation
Citation Manipulation is including excessive citations, in the submitted manuscript, that do not contribute to the scholarly content of the article and have been included solely to increase citations to a given author’s work, or articles published in a particular journal. This leads to misrepresenting the importance of the specific work and journal in which it appears and is thus a form of scientific misconduct.
6. Violation of Publication Ethics
Sanctions: If there are documented violations, the following sanctions will be applied:
- Immediate rejection of the infringing manuscript,
- Immediate rejection of every other manuscript submitted to the journal published by any of the authors of the infringing manuscript,
- Prohibition will be imposed for a minimum of 36 months against all of the authors for any new submissions to the journal, either individually or in combination with other authors of the infringing manuscript.
JEBR is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
The JEBR does not have any article processing and/or publication fees.
ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING
JEBR is indexed in Erich plus database.
JEBR journal is included in LOCKSS and CLOCKSS archival systems.
SUPPORT TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITY
Authors, librarians and readers with temporary or continuous disability are encouraged to contact us for assistance if they experience any technical difficulty while interacting with our journal. The assistance to persons with disability will be given free of charge.
FIMEK, BUSINESS ACADEMY UNIVERSITY, SERBIA
- Cvećarska 2
- 21000 Novi Sad
- Tel: +381 (0) 21 400 484
- Fax: +381 (0) 21 469 513
- Inforomatica S.r.l.
- Via Castiglione 81
- 40124 Bologna (BO) I
- Tel: 390519843125
- Fax: 390519843529
- Ph.D. Mirjana Radović Marković, Business Academy University, Serbia
- Ph.D. Marko Carić, Business Academy University, Serbia
- Ph.D. Ljiljana Marković, Belgrade University, Serbia
- Ph.D. Dušan Marković, Belgrade Business School, Serbia
- Senior Lecturer Ph.D. Aidin Salamzadeh, Entrepreneurship University, Iran
- Senior Lecturer Ph.D. Yashar Salamzadeh, Graduate School of Business, USM, Malaysia
- Assoc. Ph.D. Mario Hayek, College of Business and Entrepreneurship, Texas A&M University-Commerce, USA
- Ass. Ph.D. John Stocker, Alfred Lerner College of Business and Economics, University of Delaware, USA
- Ph.D. Dejan Radulović, Business Academy University, Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary in Novi Sad, Serbia
- Ph.D. Kaftandjiev Christo, Kazakh State University, Kazahstan
- Ph.D. Vesselin Blagoev, University of Management, Bulgaria
- Ph.D. Snezhana Ilieva, Sofia University, Bulgaria
- Ph.D. Svetlana Zenchenko, North Caucasus Federal University, Russia
- Ph.D. Neila Holland, Stratford University, United States
- Ph.D. Mohsen Ben Salem Brahmi, Southern Campus Scientific, France
- Ph.D. Boufeldja Ghiat, Oran University, Algeria
- Ph.D. Lazar Ožegović, Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management in Novi Sad, Serbia
- Ph.D. Dragan Ilić, Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management in Novi Sad, Serbia
- Ph.D. Aleksandra Tešić , Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management in Novi Sad, Serbia
- Assoc. Ph.D. Md. Shajahan Kabir, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh
- Assoc. Ph.D. Natalia Vuković, Ural Federal University, Russia
- Assoc. Ph.D. ,Yelena Shustova, Kazakh Humanitarian Law Innovative University, Kazahstan
- Assoc. Ph.D. Darko Vuković, St. Petersburg School of Economics and Management, Russia
- Assoc. Ph.D. Maja Ćirić, Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management in Novi Sad,, Serbia
- Assoc. Ph.D. Aleksandar Petrović, Union University “Nikola Tesla”, Serbia
- Senior Lecturer dr Vasileios Kallinterakis, Liverpool University, United Kingdom
- Ass. Ph.D. Muhammad Shoaib Farooq, University Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS), Malaysia
- Ass Ph.D. Arun Antony, Christ University, Bangalore, India
- Ass. Ph.D. Raghu Bir Bista, Tribhuvan University, Nepal
- Ass. Ph.D. Maja Kovačević, Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management in Novi Sad, Serbia
- Lecturer Hiroko Kesim Kawamorita, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Turkey
- Tehnical secretary Bec Anita Lazov, Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management in Novi Sad, Serbia
DR A.A. ROMÁNAssociate Professor Entrepreneurship
Curriculum Coordinator Research Line
AMSIB, Amsterdam School of International Business
DR MD SHAJAHAN KABIRProfessor
Department of Rural Sociology
Bangladesh Agricultural University
MINGALEVA ZHANNAPerm National Research
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
- Submission of a paper implies that it has not been published previously, that is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, and that if accepted it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher.
- The submission does not contain plagiarism or selfplagiarism.
- The main author, which is either first or the corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that the article has been seen and approved by all the other coauthors.
- I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Submission and that I am filling it on their behalf as their agent and I am authorised to do so.
- I have given final approval of the submitted manuscript.
- The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
- The manuscript is in Microsoft Office file format.
- The manuscript has not more than 10 pages.
- The manuscript has been spell checked.
TEMPLATE PAPERTemplate paper
- Beatrice Avolio Alecchi, CENTRUM Católica, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, Peru
- Boufeldja Ghiat, Faculty of Social Sciences, Oran University, Algeria
- José G. Vargas-Hernández, University Center for Economic and Managerial Sciences, University of Guadalajara, Mexico
- Halil Dincer Kaya, Northeastern State University, United States of America
- Carmine D'Arconte, IUSM, Università degli Studi di Roma, Foro Italico, Italy
- Aidin Salamzadeh, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Teheran, Iran
- Agota Giedrė Raišienė, Academic Association of Management and Administration (AVADA), Institute of Leadership and Strategic Management, Faculty of Public Governance, Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania
- Muhammad Shoaib Farooq, Institute of Business and Management, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
- Snezhana Ilieva, Department of Social, Work and Educational Psychology Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Bulgaria
- Imani Silver Kyaruzi, Ulster University, Great Britain
- Hiroko Kawamorita Kesim, Ondokuz Mayis University, Turkey
- Nadia Abaoub Ouertani, Ecole Supériure de Commerce, Université de Manouba, Tunis
- Vasileios Kallinterakis, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Zhanna Mingaleva, Faculty of Economics, Perm University, Russia
- Jagadees S. Pandi, Govt Arts College, Tamilnadu, India
- Raghu Bir Bista, Faculty of Economics, Tribhuvan University, Nepal
- Almir Peštek, Faculty of Economics, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Radka Čopková, Katedra ekonómie,Ekonomická fakulta TUKE, Technical University of Košice, Slovakia
- Marianna Siničáková, Katedra ekonómie,Ekonomická fakulta TUKE, Technical University of Košice, Slovakia
- Valeria Vitanova , Department of Social, Work and Educational Psychology Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Bulgaria
- Antal Szabó, ERENET, Budapest, Hungary
- Jovica Jovanović, Institute of Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, Serbia
- Dejan Radulović, Faculty of Law, University Business Academy, Novi Sad, Serbia
- Milan Počuča , Faculty of Law, University Business Academy, Novi Sad, Serbia
- Maja Ćirić, FIMEK, University Business Academy, Novi Sad, Serbia
- Elena Jovičić, Institute of Economic Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia
- Dušan Marković, Belgrade Business and Arts Academy, Begrade, Serbia
- Jovana Gardašević, FIMEK, University Business Academy, Novi Sad, Serbia
- Zorana Nikitović, Faculty for Business Economics and Entrepreneurship, Belgrade, Serbia
- Vesna Baltezarević, John Naisbitt University, Belgrade, Serbia
- Neven Vidaković, Effectus University College for Law and Finance, Croatia
- Muhammad Omolaja, British-American University, Florida, United States of America
- Borislav Đukanović, University Donja Gorica, Faculty of Humanistic Studies, Podgorica, Montenegro
- Nebojša Macanović, University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Political Sciences, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Reviewers are required to provide the qualified and timely assessment of the scholarly merits of the manuscript. The reviewer takes special care of the real contribution and originality of the manuscript. The review must be fully objective. The judgment of the reviewers must be clear and substantiated by arguments.
The reviewers assess manuscript for the compliance with the profile of the journal, the relevance of the investigated topic and applied methods, the scientific relevance of information presented in the manuscript, the presentation style and scholarly apparatus. The review has a standard format. It is submitted through the online journal management system where it is stored permanently.
The reviewer must not be in a conflict of interest with the authors or funders of research. If such a conflict exists, the reviewer is obliged to promptly notify the Editor-in-Chief. The reviewer shall not accept for reviewing papers beyond the field of his/her full competence.
Reviewers should alert the Editor-in-Chief to any well-founded suspicions or the knowledge of possible violations of ethical standards by the authors. Reviewers should recognize relevant published works that have not been considered in the manuscript. They may recommend specific references for citation, but shall not require to cite papers published in International Review, or their own papers, unless it is justified.
The reviewers are expected to improve the quality of the manuscript through their suggestions. If they recommend correction of the manuscript prior to publication, they are obliged to specify the manner in which this can be achieved.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Reviewers must not use unpublished materials disclosed in submitted manuscripts without the express written consent of the authors.
- Ph.D. Mirjana Radović Marković
- Ph.D. Dušan Marković
- Senior Lecturer Ph.D Aidin Salamzadeh
- Senior Lecturer Ph.D. Yashar Salamzadeh
FIMEK, BUSINESS ACADEMY UNIVERSITY, SERBIA
- Cvećarska 2
- 21000 Novi Sad
- Tel: 021/6392-258